“Initiated by the President and passed by the Parliament,
it is an amendment to authorize dismissal
before the end of their term of the leadership of
judicial institutions, who are ineffective, corrupt,
and use torture”
Enkhbold Zandaakhuu, Chief of Staff to the President
The confused and the reality
Just as the Parliament was about to discuss the amendment bill to the Law on the Legal Status of Judges, the current and former leadership of the Democratic Party held a hasty press conference at late hours of the night, vehemently opposing the legislative process.
Many other hasty actions have followed and snowballed into a confusion:
– Democratic Party called and then canceled an Extraordinary Assembly.
– Former President Elbegdorj summoned members of the press to “preach” that a system without minister would be better than a system without judiciary.
– While claiming that he has been “dragged through the ‘tunnel of injustice,’” former Member of Parliament Garamgaibaatar also claims that “as they already dismissed my corruption case, nothing should be changed now.”
These confused people have accused that the amendment in discussion has “compromised the judicial independence” and “destroyed democracy.”
According to opinion polls after polls, citizens have frequently ranked the judiciary as “the most unjust, corrupt, politicized, and vulnerable to undue influence” among public institutions. The main reason to propose this amendment of the Law on the Legal Status of Judges is the fact that delay of justice and dismissal of white-collar crimes of judges and prosecutors have become too common to ignore. The following is a list of just a few of the most well-known unresolved cases:
- – Case of privatizing 49 percent of the Erdenet Mining Corporation using state funds and failing to inform the Parliament;
- – Case of obtaining a large-sum loan for private use from the South African Standard Bank using forged documents and putting the Erdenet Mining Corporation as collateral;
- – Case of the so-called 60 billion tugriks that created a wide-scale scheme to sell public office positions, interfered with the election process, and seized the state power illegally;
- – Cases of obtaining loans by members of parliament and high-ranking officials from the SME Development Fund through abuse of power and misuse of state funds;
- – Case of attempting to illegally privatize the Tavan Tolgoi mine for free to a foreign company for hundred years; Case of ineffective spending of billions of tugriks and forcing to procure bogus equipment in the name of air pollution fighting;
- – Cases involving the officials who are associated with the Salkhit silver mine scandal;
- – Cases of high-ranking officials who laundered money and avoided taxes by transferring their money to offshore accounts;
- – Case of the Capital Bank, which despite of its failure of meet banking requirements, has amassed an inordinate sum of money from pension funds, mismanaged it, and became insolvent.
These are just a few of the cases that the public know of, and none of the culprits who have misappropriated billions of tugriks have been held responsible before law. The public is rightfully enraged by this gross injustice.
The genesis of politicization and attempt to unabashedly influence the judiciary and anti-corruption agency can be traced back to 2009.
How the pillars of “the tunnel of injustice” have been erected
One of the first things that Elbegdorj did after becoming the president is dismissing Prosecutor General M.Altankhuyag from his duty. All the high-ranking public officials expressed their unwillingness toward forced step down in direct and indirect manners, and the wave of dismissals started with the Prosecutor General Altankhuyag because Elbegdorj had managed to acquire evidences that were serious enough to blackmail Altankhuyag.
To get rid of him without causing any scandal, Elbegdorj spread fake news to the media in his pocket that Prosecutor General Altankhuyag was “planning to resign” while the latter was receiving medical treatment abroad. The news stories didn’t forget to invent a quote from Altankhuyag saying, “my term will end in 2010, but I am thinking about resigning before then,” purportedly said during his meeting with Elbegdorj. Altankhuyag hurriedly returned to Mongolia and met with Elbegdorj, after which he “willfully resigned without complaints.” He was replaced by Dorligjav, a close confidant of Elbegdorj. This appointment paved the way for dismissal of more and more public officials.
The next target became the Chairman of the Judicial General Council and Chief Judge S.Batdelger. Because they could not find any tangible flaw in him, Elbegdorj sent an official letter to Chief Judge Batdelger in June 2010 demanding to “hold certain 13 judges who submitted fraudulent diplomas accountable.” Just as the response letter had been drafted, news was leaked to the press that Batdelger had supposedly said, “the authenticity of judges’ diplomas is none of the president’s business.” After meeting with Elbegdorj, Batdelger also voluntarily resigned before the end of his term. As a reward for stepping down without causing any scandal, Elbegdorj had awarded Batdelger with the State Honored Lawyer title. Despite the fact that the replacement Chief Judge had health issues and was spending most of his time in the hospital, Elbegdorj extended his term in 2016 because his “blind obedience” has turned out to be valuable.
By the middle of 2010, Elbegdorj had managed to put the highest-ranking judiciary officials under his thumb. But the dismissal of the Independent Authority Against Corruption’s (anti-corruption agency) Director General Ch.Sangaragchaa, who was appointed in 2008 upon the recommendation of then-President N.Enkhbayar, proved to be problematic. Elbegdorj made a statement saying “the anti-corruption agency is incapable of performing its main duty. It’s failing to crack down the root of corruption. It has become an institution under the control of big oligarchs and turned into corruption agency, not anti-corruption agency. Therefore, the leadership must be held responsible.” Shortly after becoming the Prosecutor General, Dorligjav also started to publicly call for the dismissal of Sangaragchaa, and undoubtedly he followed the orders of Elbegdorj.
After orchestrating series of farcical events, court sentenced the anti-corruption agency Director General Sangaragchaa and its Deputy Director General Sunduisuren for 2.4 years of imprisonment on November 26, 2011 on charges of “revealing state secret, ordering an illegal clandestine operation to spy on a junior official E.Amarbat, abusing power, and defaming Chairman of the Democratic Party and Member of Parliament S.Erdene.” Interestingly, after Elbegdorj stepped down from power, Sangaragchaa and Sunduisuren lodged a petition to the Civil Court of Sukhbaatar Ditsrict in 2017, and were acquitted and received a sum of 43,484,199 tugriks each from the anti-corruption agency as compensation. Perhaps the reason why Chairman of the Democratic Party Erdene is vehemently protecting Elbegdorj and the judiciary leadership appointed by him could be explained through these events.
The events carried on with further farcical acts such as appointing N.Ganbold as the Director General of the anti-corruption agency in 2011, but forcing him to voluntarily resign in April 2016 due to “health reasons.” Yet the fact that he was appointed shortly after his resignation as the Chief of Military Intelligence Directorate at the General Intelligence Agency proves that there were no health reasons whatsoever. Soon it became evident that appointing new anti-corruption agency Director General N.Enkhjargal before Ganbold’s end of term ensures that the former would be heading the agency for at least five more years and “protect” Elbegdorj.
Based on the recent statement by Head of the Cabinet Secretariat L.Oyun-Erdene that “over 40 officials were appointed on orders during the presidency of Elbegdorj,” the alarming scale of Elbegdorj’s influence over the judicial institutions could be understood. Serious evidences have recently started to surface, serving as proofs of concealment of white-collar crimes, false charging of the political rivals of Elbegdorj for made-up crimes, and using torture methods on suspects to solve the murder case of S.Zorig.
Despite these overwhelming evidences, the hysteria of some politicians and members of the Democratic Party claiming that “the judiciary institution that has been fair and independent before is about to collapse” is perceived by the public as a futile “rhetoric.” During the years when Elbegdorj was acting as if no law could ever touch him, where were they? Why didn’t they do anything to defend democracy? Before Elbegdorj used to replace and influence the leadership of the judiciary and prosecution office through blatant coercion, pressure, and threats. Now the law has been amended so that the Parliament would finally able to discuss and make appointments in accordance with the spirit of the constitution. Who is more democratic after all?
As a final scheme to retain and protect their influence over the judiciary institution, the special interest group has begun to disseminate fake news to the international community. State institutions such as the judiciary, prosecution office, and the anti-corruption agency have all been proven, with clear evidences, using torture methods to obtain forced confession. This is a clear violation of human rights, which constitute the core value of our democracy. It has completely shattered the public’s faith in the rule of law and judiciary system by violating the citizens’ rights to due process, and served loyally to the interests of the powerful by renouncing justice. Yet the very same people are now shouting slogans such as “democracy is in peril,” “judicial independence has been compromised,” and “taking a step back from democracy” to gain international support. This is only a faint attempt to hide the internal problems by portraying it wrongly to the international community.